visual studio 2010 - VS2010 - How can two or more people edit a use-case file at the same time? -

-

i have solution written in vs2010. have modeling project in solution use case. want allow 2 or more people able edit file @ same time. also, don't want people overwrite each other. instead, i'd vs2010 merge changes. possible in vs2010?

it's not advisable multiple people work on same file @ same time, if use team foundation server version control, take @ topic managing models , graphs under version control:

merging changes in model files , diagrams

after more 1 user has worked on model concurrently, team foundation version control prompt merge changes in model files. working on separate projects described in previous preceding sections avoid of merges. ordinarily, remaining conflicts can safely merged automatically. following kinds of changes should cause no difficulty:

  • types of lifelines. when add lifeline interaction (sequence diagram), type stored in root model, unless have created lifeline existing type.

  • new activities , interactions stored in root model.

  • adding elements , relationships.

  • renaming or deleting elements referenced within own package.

working on shared modeling projects

to minimize conflicts between concurrent work on different parts of project:

  • divide modeling project packages representing different areas of work. move entire model packages, instead of leaving in root model. more information, see defining packages , namespaces.

  • different users should not work on same package or diagram @ same time.

  • if using profiles, make sure has installed same profiles. see customizing model profiles , stereotypes.

to ensure change package working on:

  • set linkedpackage property of uml class, component, or use case diagram.

  • in uml model explorer, drag activity or interaction package have created it. element appear in uml model explorer when create first node in activity or sequence diagram.

  • to keep track of packages, rename package files reflect actual package names.

  • in team foundation version control, perform check in , latest version operations on complete modeling project, never on individual files.

  • always perform operation before check in modeling project.

  • always close diagrams before perform operation.

note if file open when perform get, , operation results in local changes, prompted reload file. in case, click no, , reload complete project. in solution explorer, right-click modeling project node, click unload project, , click reload project.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

php - What is the difference between $_SERVER['PATH_INFO'] and $_SERVER['ORIG_PATH_INFO']? -

-
what’s difference between $_server['path_info'] , $_server['orig_path_info'] ? how use them? when run print_r($_server) , path_info , orig_path_info not present in array. why not? how can enable them? i have read php manual on them, still don’t understand them. the path_info variable present if invoke php script this: http://www.example.com/phpinfo.php/hello_there it's /hello_there part after .php script. if don't invoke url that, there won't $_server["path_info"] environment variable. the porig_ prefix uncommon. path_info standard cgi-environment variable, , should never prefixed. did read that? (there issues around php3/php4 if invoked php interpreter via cgi-bin/ - hardly has such setups today.) for reference: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3875
Read more

fortran - Function return type mismatch -

-
i'm attempting recode old c++ program in fortran make use of lapack (i'm aware c++ have lapack++, i'm having lot of trouble installing it, gave up). i didn't have problems compilation, when had variables declared real . when started coding section of program required lapack, found parameters passed dsyev need double precision . tried change double precision (including changing hard coded numbers double precision counterparts, i.e. 0.0 -> 0.0d0) when try compile, following error of functions , subroutines i've written: error: return type mismatch of function <function> @ (1) (real(4)/real(8)) i'm not sure coming from, in program has been changed double precision. for example, i've declared following: double precision :: alpha(3),d(3),zeta1,zeta2 double precision :: a1(3),a2(3),d1(3),d2(3) double precision :: pi pi = 3.14159265359d0 alpha = (/0.109818d0, 0.405771d0, 2.22766d0/) d = (/0.444635d0, 0.535328d0, 0.154329d0 /) 10 i=1,3 ...
Read more

queue - mq_receive: message too long -

-
i implementing communication between 2 processes using queue. problem when call function mq_receive, error: message long. i have done following: struct mq_attr attr; long size = attr.mq_msgsize; .... // initializing queue "/gateway" int rc = mq_receive(gateway, buffer, size, &prio); if print size value, size=1, while when print same size program (got same mechanism), not long integer ( -1217186280 )... how can solve error?....so while size = 1, believe it's right "message long" why 1? p.s. have tried put : int rc = mq_receive(gateway, buffer, sizeof(buffer), &prio); but no result. it seems need read docs more carefully. when call mq_receive should pass size of destination buffer. this size must greater mq_msgsize attribute of queue . in addition, seems have error in queue attributes initialisation makes proper mq_receive call impossible. here standard message queue session: fill mq_attr struct ( doc ): struct mq_a...
Read more