redirect - google analytics receiving data vs. redirecting that causes NS_BINDING_ABORTED -

-

okay first off, sorry if title doesn't make sense...i'm not sure how else summarize it!

so here's issue:

i using jquery attach click event form's submit button. jquery click event triggers ga code track virtual page view can use step in goal funnel.

but happens there's no delay between ga code executing , submit, i'm concerned ga isn't getting data.

when @ what's happening in firebug or httpfox (browser addons @ requests/response) vs. charles proxy (external sniffer, separate browser) seeing 2 different things.

with firebug/httpfox see request ga status of 0 , showing (aborted) ns_binding_aborted

...though show bytes having been sent etc.. nothing response.

but charles proxy, seeing same request status of 200 , 1x1 pixel response.

so theory here ga is receiving data, browser moving on before gets actual response - i'm okay with, long ga getting data, i'm okay this. theory , don't know...

i know can write code delay execution of submit 500ms or whatever insurance, don't wanna have if it's not necessary..

and know if nothing else can see if data showing in ga ga has 24-48 hour delay on data hard qa.

does know or have suggestions experience...has else experienced "abort" thing , can 1 way or other if necessary delay submit or whatever?

httpfox not real sniffer. tries mimic one. data see on not happening in background. charles should better picture. if you're seeing 200 code in charles. chances hit going through.

the bad news when fire hits @ time page unloads. (outbound clicks, insite link clicks, form submissions, window.unload, etc) won't go through every , then. happens because google analytics js call appends gif page. , returns after that. browser load gif. when code returns browser free go, , if goes away page cancel pending requests may have, including small gif image. browser might haven't sent tracking code, or might have sent it, tcp connection didn't go through , browser need resend package, he's not willing anymore.

so if accuracy need you, should add 200-500 ms delay it. remember google analytics not accuracy tool, , if events don't go through won't affect final outcome of analysis.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

php - What is the difference between $_SERVER['PATH_INFO'] and $_SERVER['ORIG_PATH_INFO']? -

-
what’s difference between $_server['path_info'] , $_server['orig_path_info'] ? how use them? when run print_r($_server) , path_info , orig_path_info not present in array. why not? how can enable them? i have read php manual on them, still don’t understand them. the path_info variable present if invoke php script this: http://www.example.com/phpinfo.php/hello_there it's /hello_there part after .php script. if don't invoke url that, there won't $_server["path_info"] environment variable. the porig_ prefix uncommon. path_info standard cgi-environment variable, , should never prefixed. did read that? (there issues around php3/php4 if invoked php interpreter via cgi-bin/ - hardly has such setups today.) for reference: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3875
Read more

fortran - Function return type mismatch -

-
i'm attempting recode old c++ program in fortran make use of lapack (i'm aware c++ have lapack++, i'm having lot of trouble installing it, gave up). i didn't have problems compilation, when had variables declared real . when started coding section of program required lapack, found parameters passed dsyev need double precision . tried change double precision (including changing hard coded numbers double precision counterparts, i.e. 0.0 -> 0.0d0) when try compile, following error of functions , subroutines i've written: error: return type mismatch of function <function> @ (1) (real(4)/real(8)) i'm not sure coming from, in program has been changed double precision. for example, i've declared following: double precision :: alpha(3),d(3),zeta1,zeta2 double precision :: a1(3),a2(3),d1(3),d2(3) double precision :: pi pi = 3.14159265359d0 alpha = (/0.109818d0, 0.405771d0, 2.22766d0/) d = (/0.444635d0, 0.535328d0, 0.154329d0 /) 10 i=1,3 ...
Read more

queue - mq_receive: message too long -

-
i implementing communication between 2 processes using queue. problem when call function mq_receive, error: message long. i have done following: struct mq_attr attr; long size = attr.mq_msgsize; .... // initializing queue "/gateway" int rc = mq_receive(gateway, buffer, size, &prio); if print size value, size=1, while when print same size program (got same mechanism), not long integer ( -1217186280 )... how can solve error?....so while size = 1, believe it's right "message long" why 1? p.s. have tried put : int rc = mq_receive(gateway, buffer, sizeof(buffer), &prio); but no result. it seems need read docs more carefully. when call mq_receive should pass size of destination buffer. this size must greater mq_msgsize attribute of queue . in addition, seems have error in queue attributes initialisation makes proper mq_receive call impossible. here standard message queue session: fill mq_attr struct ( doc ): struct mq_a...
Read more